134

This was originally published here, in French (link).
We provide this translation for your convenience. Practical aspects may differ where you live.



The 1/14 is already healing a little...

By Charles-Edouard!

You'll have to get used to it:

Having followed the story for a long time and having fought with our friend for a long time, this is an honest testimony. There are now 2 of us, since I have just switched to 1/14, with an inflated combo. Our friend had a very small CV before treatment (3000). I'm a fan of the 'big bomb, long silence'. If others manage to do it with just a small grenade (DTG/3TC), well, all the better!

As for me, after my failure of DTG 150 mg 1/7, it is understandable that I don't do DTG/3TC in 1/14! Everyone does according to where they are and how they get there.

1/14, release day and social security contribution

I am for solidarity, but against abuse. Until recently, the basic young homo paid, on his workUntil recently, the basic young homo paid a family allowance contribution, which you'd have to be really twisted to think that he'd ever benefit from it. Everyone is exposed to unemployment or health risks: the contribution gives rights. No! I am not exposed to the risk of having many children! I find it disgusting to contribute through work. Through taxation, that's another thing. Very recently, the thing has been put back in order, which proves that my aversion to an iniquitous system was justified.

For health, likewise: there are young people who enter active life by being, from the start, net debtors of the system. A young gay man is 200 times more exposed to HIV than another! Fortunately, there is PreP (free) to set the record straight! A young Chinese gay man is overexposed to the risk, but his treatment, in the second largest economy in the world, is $60 a year! Some people like being a net contributor. Oh, I know the crybabies (profiteers) feel differently! Good for them: young gays vote with their feet and go live in Canada, Switzerland, etc... Where they are not subject to financial discrimination. France attracts poorly qualified people and turns away its graduates. And if you think that young German engineers are rushing to our borders for the privilege of financing the CAF, you are wrong!

To be a net contributor is a credit to those who find it abusive to unduly exploit a natural inclination. We will see, with Islatravir, that its invention did not cost Merck a penny, which is going to make billions on your back: that is the medical-pharmaceutical underworld. The CPAM will benefit from a windfall of hundreds of millions, thanks to the 4/7. Do you think for a moment that they will say thank you? Or that they will have contributed at all to its advent? No! Stipended 'assocs' are slowing down ! Have you seen them positively echoing Quatuor? Not even! All this little world is living off youNot even! a little less each year and good luck!

The 1/14 is not a beauty contest

For the 1/14, release day is January 26! 1 year of your treatments serve us 14 years. So let the 7/7, in maintenance, go to the end of their frightening logic and pay for the part of the drugs that do not make them more than a placebo or a food supplement!

I understand that trying 3/7, 2/7, etc., there are some who fail and must resume the same treatment at a more sustained pace. Getting to a dynamic remission may not be for everyone right away, and it will be quite technical, a technicality that your doctor(of my two) does not master. So what?! So what?! The one who arrives at the 1/14 marker, she doesn't care!!!. We have the right to explore and exploit an Eclipse whose existence is not in doubt!

It is not the race to the shallot. Anyway, the person who is at X/7 will necessarily ask himself one day the question of (X-1)/7. It's only a matter of time! And, with the arrival of Islatravir, the first molecule duly stamped: 10d. or more, things will move!!!

I'm pushing for a 3/7 trial, the only quick way to prove the robustness of 4/7; I'm pushing, but not more than that... The advent of 3/7 is inevitable (with Odyfsey, for example)

And our friend here has succeeded in 1/14 with DTG/3TC, without bloating a bit, but again, it is only a matter of time before he tries 6/21, 5/21, 4/21, etc. When Islatravir becomes available, will he substitute DTG for Islatravir (moderate genetic barrier)? No! he will add it, and there it is in TRI (or even Quadri, because they will be smart and forcefully combine it with Doravirine)

And, of course, the collaborator of service to persifler:

And to the question: which doctor? She never answers: and for good reason! Even Leibo is useless to us on 1/14, so useless at 1/14 or useless at all, it's the same

Obligation of treatment / Judiciarization

The USA is a theocracy, in case you didn't realize it... Here, in France, we are in the middle of a vaccination frenzy: But [the HAS] also raises the fact that 'HPV vaccination limited to girls and MSM raises questions of ethics, equal access to vaccination and stigmatization linked to sexual orientation and non-respect of privacy'. source: LeMonde

Well no!!! Vaccinating young gay men against HBV, to which they are more exposed, is a rather good idea, despite the proven risk of multiple sclerosis. The increased risk tilts the balance in favor of this vaccination, which I did myself, as such. Never Oh never, have I felt discriminated against for doing it and others not!!! This is ridiculous: we cry discrimination for everything and anythingThe side effects of this vaccination will not be detectable by the health care system, and we are heading towards a new health scandal.

We remind them, and the ActUpians too, thatthere is a jurisprudence, called Nuremberg jurisprudence (which is not nothing), which says that one cannot inflict a medical act for the benefit of others: It is not that eugenics does not work, it is that it is contrary to human dignityIt is not that eugenics doesn't work, it is that it is not: no, the massive HPV vaccination will have only a marginal effect. In Australia, which is an island, there is a very small effect (and none on cancers), and they don't count the side effects, because they can't make the correlation. That's right, you can't make the correlation... So what? This does not invalidate the suspicion of cause and effect. We are in the middle of a ridiculous situation and it was urgent to fire the ex-ActUp!

Have a good weekend, get drunk and don't take too many pills... Right?