Search This Blog

Thursday, February 3, 2022

188



This was originally published here, in French (link).
We provide this translation for your convenience. Practical aspects may differ where you live.




The Saint Darwin or the End of Darwin

By Charles-Edouard!

Of course, it's a bit ironic: after two millennia of Catholicism, we're still looking for God's hand in life's contingencies. Abrahamism, and by way of recursion, Adamism, holds that we are all descendants, according to the same model, of a single human ancestor. Darwin overturns this by making all beings, all species, descendants of different ancestors, in fact, each time a little. By recursion, there is then a common ancestor to all beings.

This is just as false as Abrahamism, but a little less so, and so revolutionary. Lamarck, in 1809, in his Philosophie zoologique, exposes the concept of evolution of species. Darwin exposes a mechanism. Since then, others have been elucidated, and recently, it has been thrown in our faces!

Baltimore, Montagnier and other Nobel Prize winners


The founding dogma of molecular biology, enunciated by Francis H. C. Crick (Nobel Laureate), is that the information contained in genes is always transmitted unidirectionally from DNA to RNA (and then to proteins) and cannot be transmitted in the opposite direction. By dismissing the possibility of the RNA of SARS being written into the chromosomes, the propagandists fell in line with the dogma. Which had been invalidated by... David Baltimore (Nobel Prize winner for this discovery) and Dubelco (also Nobel Prize winner). Montagnier, then a researcher in the United Kingdom, perfected his own techniques, benefiting from the collaboration with Dubelco. He then set up a laboratory at Pasteur, and we know what happened next...

The exception does not prove the rule: it invalidates it, period. All S+ is the living proof and at least for itself, that RNA can be integrated... We know it, thanks to several Nobel prizes! This has not prevented the SPILF to perorate the contrary, and the agitation to take up again in heart, and cover itself with ridicule. It is here, and, frankly it would be funny if it did not show the weaknesses of our national Virology: pathetic!

CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG ??? $#!+! Is there a Modernagate???


The case begins with a tweet from (@JikkyKjj) / Twitter.

But where does this #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG sequence come from? Here is what Alexandra says:
Well, that's jargon for us, so let's ask S. Bancel, CEO of Moderna... Here is his answer, on Fox at minute 7: 'the Wuhan laboratory may have made a mistake and may be responsible for it [...] Our scientists are checking. '. To be continued, then...

Genotoxicity


Didn't the FDA ask Pfizer for genotoxicity studies? Raoult and Alexandra warned you about the possible integrability of the code? We are still waiting! Well, a little less now that this in vivo study has been published: Intracellular reverse transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 BNT162b2 mRNA in vitro in a human liver cell line.
Contrast this quote from an article in Le Monde in December 2020: 'Our current knowledge of how mRNA and the cell work is clear: mRNA vaccines cannot modify the DNA of human cells'. Well... It is advisable to abstain from speaking too quickly, to spread 'knowledge', especially when one does not have the least competence!

The proximal hypothesis... undermined...


The proximal hypothesis... This is the nice name that designates the hypothesis of the natural origin, in a word the bat that fucks a Pangolin... We don't hear many people defending it anymore! The uncovering of funding by the NIH, bypassing de facto the moratorium decreed by Obama, decreed because it is too risky, the refusal by DARPA (US Army) to fund Daschak's project, the persistent disappearance of the head of the Wuhan Lab (alias Batwoman), the famous furin cleavage site, etc, etc. That's a lot!

Baric explains here how to make money with a pandemic, and also the gain of function, also well explained by P. Daszak in this video

See this very complete study by Yuri Deigin and this excellent article by H. Banoun: The origin of the Covid-19 virus (in French)

The 'unfortunate' word by Bill Gates


Did his tongue slip? It's on YouTube, here
And to conclude that we will have to anticipate better, and be even faster.

Certainly, Bill... Once bitten, twice shy... For the poor 'fucked up' too, it will be necessary to anticipate better, and to be even faster!...

Weekly catch and 1/15


I'm making my 1/15 evolve: with my next dose, I'll go to 1/17... We'll see that next time.... Note that I feel less alone... Other almost-cured come to join us. We know of them thanks to a scientific publication.We will come back to them...

In the news...


- according to this opinion of the High Council of Public Health, of Jan. 11, 2022, available here:
You can't make this up!

- The swedish roulette: Here is the trick: you count the freshly vaccinated, recently infected (yes, it happens often, too often...) as unvaccinated. Doublepunch! We reduce the denominator, we increase the numerator and bingo! we create vaccine effectiveness ex-nihilo! Fenton (a probabilist...) had explained it, Marco Nius updated it. The idea is taken up by Pierre Chaillot (a statistician...) in an excellent humorous video, censored, but available here.

- The blog will become multilingual again: already the English version is catching up. It will soon be followed by the Brazilian version. I'm already considering a Spanish, Italian, etc. version.

- BREAKING NEWS: the article about Quatuor's results is published: it is here

Pieces of Anthology


This tweet from Prof. Molimard has aged very badly:
Oh, now I distrust pharmacokineticists (and those who foolishly echo them) like the plague! They are the kings of THE dose... But, as the Eclipse shows: THE dose is a lie! So, beware, beware...

A French genius


Pierre Sonigo is the father of your Pasteurian diagnostics and also of the Eclipse. We would like to see him again on this field! The video he delivers is remarkable for its clarity, intelligence and benevolence. If we want to understand what happened and finally put an end to the hysteria, if there is only one video to remember from this whole unfortunate affair, then we will go to his magnificent intervention at the Independent Scientific Council (ISC n°43: Immunity and Covid). It can be found on YouTube at minute 48.

As soon as we take into account the great omissions of the case: the circulating coronaviruses, the immunity acquired by children and those under 60 years of age, the erosion of this immunity, which is durable but not eternal, that it protects against severe forms of the disease but not against transmission, that it distorts the very notion of testing, that it makes it impossible to determine the right dose and the efficacy of the vaccine, we are dumbfounded. This is a great lesson for the future. The same applies to the Eclipse! Once we conceive it, once we observe it, we realize the ineptitude of THE dose, but also of mass trials. Since we don't all have the same Eclipse, we won't all have the same intermittency and there is a benefit in seeking to extend the Eclipse.

In another register, the famous Momotchi's(whose pseudonym, I humbly confess, I thought was hiding a HE electronic engineer, a HE and not a SHE) Cartesian, methodical analysis invited to leave France for Sweden is very impressive of clarity and calm. We discover her in this interview.

Finally, to open the minds and souls, this excellent choreography by Bintou Dembele: Les Indes Galantes - Dance of the Great Pipe of Peace. Great!

Feel free to comment, like, share and use

One believes to suffer to be cured, one merely suffers to enrich financiers... (inspired by Anatole France)

Wednesday, February 2, 2022

187



This was originally published here, in French (link).
We provide this translation for your convenience. Practical aspects may differ where you live.




4/7 in Italy! It's coming, it's coming...

By Charles-Edouard!

Very pertinent question, asked here:
What could be more natural than to think about it! When you see success rates of almost 100% in 4/7 for others, and a prolonged efficiency for yourself, you would like to think that limiting yourself to 5/7 would have been a missed opportunity. As it is iterative and Darwinian, the next increment is 3/7, it is obvious. This is not validated by a large clinical trial... So what??? it has not been invalidated either. If you don't even look for it, you can't find it!

The experimental method is described in FASEB-1: make sure of the good susceptibility of HIS virus (something that must have been done before initiating 4/7, so normally it's good), make sure of the efficacy at 4/7, don't try it under Isentress, Genvoya, Kaletra (but who still takes that?) monitor at the beginning by CV 1 month, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months (at the beginning only), and that's all! BIOLOGICAL follow-up necessary. The medical follow-up? Well... For the comfort of the mind? Maybe ? And still ... In any case, the medical follow-up in 3/7, did exist (100% success rate, subtracting the risk combos), and, in practice, it disappeared with Leibowitch...

What does the ANRS tell you? It could not be clearer: ' Get on with it
'...

A new publication in 4/7


This publication comes from Italy. We had distributed our biblio to various clinicians. Including them... Did it help? I don't know. We can see that French works are abundantly cited (ICCARE, Leibowitch, Calin, ANRS-4D, Quatuor). Normal, there are not many others (Breather, in 5/7, at most...). The results are the same: 100% success, a few dropouts... It's like usual... Nothing new... And the nothing new is reassuring!

The very interesting discussion is in the body of the text. That's why I made a translation in french, in extenso. You have to read it. There is a vibrant tribute to ICCARRE, despite a small inaccuracy: Leibowitch et al. published in 2010 (FASEB-1 and 2015 FASEB-2), BREATHER was published in 2016, so Leibowitch is earlier, not the other way around...


The dosages... They are instructive!


They made 4 dosages per patient... It is instructive, because as in ANRS 4-D, there are cheaters, and it shows! There seems to be 1 or 2 who take more, but mostly a dozen, or a third, who take less. And it works just as well! It shows us the way: 4/7 is good to start... It's a start... And, after a while, you have to grow up

The threshold dose is a joke!


The threshold dose is determined by the failures when introducing the molecule in a new therapeutic scheme. Never in the long term, never... I challenge you to find a threshold dose at T plus 1 year that is equal to that seen in the short term. The good example is Nevirapine, with its dose-dependent failures at less than 6 months(thanks to poor tolerability in some), but no failure beyond 8 months. No failures: no threshold.

The authors discuss here the doses observed after 3 days of interruption (but perhaps more, the patients were just doing their own thing), and we are successful even at values well below the IC90. Note that the 'official' therapeutic dose is 3 times IC90 for Rilpivirine, while it is 15 times IC90 for the more effective Dolutegravir. Look for the mistake...

The Eclipse exists: we see it, so what does the threshold dose mean? Moreover, in the long term, we don't know how to determine it. In the stable phase, it's just a flan!

Can do better...


I like this kind of publication: it is an obvious progress in the percolation of ICCARRE at the international level. This publication is in addition to the others. This poses 2 problems:

- as long as one perceives that the Eclipse is only a few days long, for everyone(vision of the 2000s), it is quite logical to consider the results of others for a reflection on oneself. Now that we have Eclipses that are both longer and more dispersed, these tests on others, on non-identical viruses, no longer make any sense!

- The tests accumulate ad nauseam. Medical Darwinism obliges, it is only a question of time that we pass to 3/7... And what a waste of time! Obviously, if 4/7 is as 'good' as 7/7, it is no less 'bad'.

The 'enemy' of yesteryear was 7/7(will there still be people to practice it in a few years?). It has fallen. The new 'enemy' is the 4/7: it will necessarily fall one day...

In the news


- Satoshi Omura, Japanese Nobel Prize winner, presents I*T as a treatment against C*D: no doubt, a Nobel Prize is no match for 'fax checkers' without the slightest scientific background. It should be noted thatin vitro I*T is as effective on Omega as on the others...

- Before/After critical analysis of the pasteurian 'predictions', it's here, and it's scouring! (it's good too...)

- Very well documented article by Helene Bannoun: The origin of the Covid-19 virus

- Very interesting Evaluation of the methodological methodological practices implemented in Pfizer trials, by Christine COTTON

- Genetic Forcing, Self-Disseminating Vaccines, Chimeric Viruses... The sorcerers' apprentices of the genome by our excellent Bruno Canard, Étienne Decroly Jacques Van Helden (it's not free, but if you ask nicely...)

Pieces of Anthology


- The virus has not mutated,' says Professor Karine Lacombe on RTL (at 4 min 50 sec): To be enjoyed in moderation!

- Typhus, a little history on Science.org:

The French genius


Today is Saint Darwin's day! It was Lamarck who discovered Evolution. Darwin, the Evolution under pressure from Selection. This is still relevant, even if many advances have been made since then. Our French genius is Montagnier, who died on February 8.
If he had not set up the Pasteurian Laboratory on Oncoviruses, there would not have been the very lucrative patent, there would probably not have been Barré Sinoussi or Schermann at the head of this world competition. There would have been a genius, but not French...

We don't care about the rest, the squabbles, the greatness and the smallness. Read again Darwin, Descartes or Newton, it's not all rosy either; they also said some bullshit with no equal; history will sort it out.

The fact remains that for us, Montagnier was the beacon of a whole generation! In fact, I am interested in 2 concepts that he exposed:

- DNA does not integrate randomly anywhere (so depending on where it is integrated, it will be more or less active)

- silencing(passive reservoir) is a reasonable therapeutic goal(as for tuberculosis)

We will come back to this, it is inevitable, since it is our salvation...

Feel free to comment, like, share and use

Turn off the TV and don't be fooled by Pharisee venality



Tuesday, February 1, 2022

186-1



This was originally published here, in French (link).
We provide this translation for your convenience. Practical aspects may differ where you live.


We will miss Professor Luc Montagnier!

By Charles-Edouard!

Prof. Montagnier has left us: it is very sad


I had planned in my posts in preparation (The Saint Darwin 2022, the Italian 3/7), a paragraph "French Genius" dedicated to Pr. Montagnier. During his last public intervention (Parliament of Luxembourg) he seemed so weak that I considered a tribute during his lifetime. If you want to tell people that you admire them, you might as well say it when they can hear it.

Reality catches me off guard. France Soir, historically a newspaper of resistance fighters, is rejuvenating itself and announces his death on February 8th. My sorrow is immense, my gratitude too. My soul is sad and I have read all his books... Including recently, a video (already cited, it is here) left us a milestone on the path we can follow. He talks about what we can aim for in terms of healing.

The Charles-Edouardian thought, the only one to have ever led to near healing, was reinforced by his insights. We shall discuss further the fact that insertion into the reservoir is not random and that we can hope to encyst the Monster, if not eliminate it. Montagnier was faster than we were, and to understand what he said requires time to reflect. We will come back to this...

At the time of writing, the AFP has not yet deigned to inform you. The search for "AFP + Montagnier", in the news tab, does not return anything, for the moment. Let's bet that they will end up announce the death of one of our national pride. We will see, we will judge...

In the meantime, let's come back to what Montagnier was able to explain and which sheds light on our vision of a possible therapy, one can gladly indulge in the sadness of having lost a beacon of lucidity in an ocean of mediocrity.

186



This was originally published here, in French (link).
We provide this translation for your convenience. Practical aspects may differ where you live.




4/7 in Italy! It's coming, it's coming...

By Charles-Edouard!

Very pertinent question, asked here:
What could be more natural than to think about it! When you see success rates of almost 100% in 4/7 for others, and a prolonged efficiency for yourself, you would like to think that limiting yourself to 5/7 would have been a missed opportunity. As it is iterative and Darwinian, the next increment is 3/7, it is obvious. This is not validated by a large clinical trial... So what??? it has not been invalidated either. If you don't even look for it, you can't find it!

The experimental method is described in FASEB-1: make sure of the good susceptibility of HIS virus (something that must have been done before initiating 4/7, so normally it's good), make sure of the efficacy at 4/7, don't try it under Isentress, Genvoya, Kaletra (but who still takes that?) monitor at the beginning by CV 1 month, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months (at the beginning only), and that's all! BIOLOGICAL follow-up necessary. The medical follow-up? Well... For the comfort of the mind? Maybe ? And still ... In any case, the medical follow-up in 3/7, did exist (100% success rate, subtracting the risk combos), and, in practice, it disappeared with Leibowitch...

What does the ANRS tell you? It could not be clearer: " Get on with it
"...

A new publication in 4/7


This publication comes from Italy. We had distributed our biblio to various clinicians. Including them... Did it help? I don't know. We can see that French works are abundantly cited (ICCARE, Leibowitch, Calin, ANRS-4D, Quatuor). Normal, there are not many others (Breather, in 5/7, at most...). The results are the same: 100% success, a few dropouts... It's like usual... Nothing new... And the nothing new is reassuring!

The very interesting discussion is in the body of the text. That's why I made a translation in french, in extenso. You have to read it. There is a vibrant tribute to ICCARRE, despite a small inaccuracy: Leibowitch et al. published in 2010 (FASEB-1 and 2015 FASEB-2), BREATHER was published in 2016, so Leibowitch is earlier, not the other way around...


The dosages... They are instructive!


They made 4 dosages per patient... It is instructive, because as in ANRS 4-D, there are cheaters, and it shows! There seems to be 1 or 2 who take more, but mostly a dozen, or a third, who take less. And it works just as well! It shows us the way: 4/7 is good to start... It's a start... And, after a while, you have to grow up

The threshold dose is a joke!


The threshold dose is determined by the failures when introducing the molecule in a new therapeutic scheme. Never in the long term, never... I challenge you to find a threshold dose at T plus 1 year that is equal to that seen in the short term. The good example is Nevirapine, with its dose-dependent failures at less than 6 months(thanks to poor tolerability in some), but no failure beyond 8 months. No failures: no threshold.

The authors discuss here the doses observed after 3 days of interruption (but perhaps more, the patients were just doing their own thing), and we are successful even at values well below the IC90. Note that the 'official' therapeutic dose is 3 times IC90 for Rilpivirine, while it is 15 times IC90 for the more effective Dolutegravir. Look for the mistake...

The Eclipse exists: we see it, so what does the threshold dose mean? Moreover, in the long term, we don't know how to determine it. In the stable phase, it's just a flan!

Can do better...


I like this kind of publication: it is an obvious progress in the percolation of ICCARRE at the international level. This publication is in addition to the others. This poses 2 problems:

- as long as one perceives that the Eclipse is only a few days long, for everyone(vision of the 2000s), it is quite logical to consider the results of others for a reflection on oneself. Now that we have Eclipses that are both longer and more dispersed, these tests on others, on non-identical viruses, no longer make any sense!

- The tests accumulate ad nauseam. Medical Darwinism obliges, it is only a question of time that we pass to 3/7... And what a waste of time! Obviously, if 4/7 is as 'good' as 7/7, it is no less 'bad'.

The 'enemy' of yesteryear was 7/7(will there still be people to practice it in a few years?). It has fallen. The new 'enemy' is the 4/7: it will necessarily fall one day...

In the news


- Satoshi Omura, Japanese Nobel Prize winner, presents I*T as a treatment against C*D: no doubt, a Nobel Prize is no match for 'fax checkers' without the slightest scientific background. It should be noted thatin vitro I*T is as effective on Omega as on the others...

- Before/After critical analysis of the pasteurian 'predictions', it's here, and it's scouring! (it's good too...)

- Very well documented article by Helene Bannoun: The origin of the Covid-19 virus

- Very interesting Evaluation of the methodological methodological practices implemented in Pfizer trials, by Christine COTTON

- Genetic Forcing, Self-Disseminating Vaccines, Chimeric Viruses... The sorcerers' apprentices of the genome by our excellent Bruno Canard, Étienne Decroly Jacques Van Helden (it's not free, but if you ask nicely...)

Pieces of Anthology


- The virus has not mutated," says Professor Karine Lacombe on RTL (at 4 min 50 sec): To be enjoyed in moderation!

- Typhus, a little history on Science.org:

The French genius


Today is Saint Darwin's day! It was Lamarck who discovered Evolution. Darwin, the Evolution under pressure from Selection. This is still relevant, even if many advances have been made since then. Our French genius is Montagnier, who died on February 8.
If he had not set up the Pasteurian Laboratory on Oncoviruses, there would not have been the very lucrative patent, there would probably not have been Barré Sinoussi or Schermann at the head of this world competition. There would have been a genius, but not French...

We don't care about the rest, the squabbles, the greatness and the smallness. Read again Darwin, Descartes or Newton, it's not all rosy either; they also said some bullshit with no equal; history will sort it out.

The fact remains that for us, Montagnier was the beacon of a whole generation! In fact, I am interested in 2 concepts that he exposed:

- DNA does not integrate randomly anywhere (so depending on where it is integrated, it will be more or less active)

- silencing(passive reservoir) is a reasonable therapeutic goal(as for tuberculosis)

We will come back to this, it is inevitable, since it is our salvation...

Feel free to comment, like, share and use

Turn off the TV and don't be fooled by Pharisee venality